1
00:00:00,710 --> 00:00:06,390
In this video, let's discuss two things that is a common mistake among students.

2
00:00:06,920 --> 00:00:11,710
Now we have learned four methods to check on currency of two given triangles.

3
00:00:11,900 --> 00:00:12,630
What were they?

4
00:00:12,890 --> 00:00:14,440
We saw the Essence's rule.

5
00:00:14,990 --> 00:00:17,150
We saw the SARS rule.

6
00:00:17,420 --> 00:00:20,700
The NCAA rule or a rule, right?

7
00:00:21,350 --> 00:00:22,520
E is.

8
00:00:23,270 --> 00:00:25,550
And we've seen the arches rule.

9
00:00:25,550 --> 00:00:27,230
These are the four rules that we discussed.

10
00:00:27,410 --> 00:00:30,480
Now, E or S.

11
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:35,410
S e these two are not rules to check congruency.

12
00:00:35,780 --> 00:00:42,080
So let's try to understand why they are not sufficient rules to establish congruency of two triangles.

13
00:00:42,410 --> 00:00:42,860
All right.

14
00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:48,170
Now, let's start with a think of a smaller and bigger equilateral triangle.

15
00:00:48,380 --> 00:00:52,460
We know that in an equilateral triangle, all the angles are equal to 60 degrees.

16
00:00:52,460 --> 00:00:52,670
Right.

17
00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:55,050
Let me take two equilateral triangles over here.

18
00:00:55,310 --> 00:00:58,760
I have a small triangle and a bigger equilateral triangle.

19
00:00:59,030 --> 00:01:04,590
Let's say that the side over here is two centimeter and let the side over here be 10 centimeter.

20
00:01:04,910 --> 00:01:10,120
Now, because all the angles are equal to 60 degrees, I can say that this angle is equal to this angle.

21
00:01:10,130 --> 00:01:10,450
Right.

22
00:01:10,690 --> 00:01:13,700
I can say at this angle is equal to this angle.

23
00:01:13,970 --> 00:01:18,160
And I can see this angle is equal to this angle.

24
00:01:18,170 --> 00:01:18,560
Right.

25
00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:23,980
But it's clearly visually evident that these two triangles are not congruent.

26
00:01:24,140 --> 00:01:30,450
If you superimpose this triangle on top of this triangle, it will not cover exactly right.

27
00:01:30,630 --> 00:01:37,880
Therefore, these two triangles are not congruent and hence it is not sufficient to establish congruency

28
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:38,840
of two triangles.

29
00:01:39,290 --> 00:01:39,740
All right.

30
00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:41,390
Now, let's move on to S.

31
00:01:41,390 --> 00:01:49,640
S e now as it means you have two sides given and you have given an angle, which is not an included

32
00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:50,080
angle.

33
00:01:50,300 --> 00:01:50,650
Right.

34
00:01:50,840 --> 00:01:51,990
Let's take an example.

35
00:01:52,220 --> 00:01:53,920
Let me have a triangle over here.

36
00:01:56,190 --> 00:02:01,290
Let's say this is Triangle ABC and we know this side.

37
00:02:02,850 --> 00:02:11,130
We know this site and we are given this angle right now, can you draw a triangle with only these three

38
00:02:11,130 --> 00:02:14,530
pieces of information without any ambiguity?

39
00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:15,920
No, you cannot, right.

40
00:02:15,990 --> 00:02:16,810
Why is that so?

41
00:02:17,010 --> 00:02:22,150
Because two triangles are possible with these three conditions satisfied.

42
00:02:22,330 --> 00:02:23,040
Let's see them.

43
00:02:23,640 --> 00:02:25,160
You have two triangles over here.

44
00:02:25,470 --> 00:02:29,100
These two triangles satisfy the given criteria.

45
00:02:29,250 --> 00:02:37,560
That is B-R is equal to argue is equal to Acey and this angle Q is equal to this angle C right now.

46
00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:40,660
Instead of constructing it over here, I could take it like this also.

47
00:02:40,690 --> 00:02:41,000
Right.

48
00:02:41,220 --> 00:02:45,540
But what's happening over here is you start constructing BQ, that's step one.

49
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:47,410
And then at point.

50
00:02:47,410 --> 00:02:50,660
Q which is any point because you don't know this length.

51
00:02:50,670 --> 00:02:51,900
So this is just a line.

52
00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:58,260
You draw a line from point Q at an angle equal to the different angle C over here.

53
00:02:58,620 --> 00:03:00,450
So you get a construction like this.

54
00:03:00,450 --> 00:03:05,510
We have drawn a line like this and you draw a line like this at the given angle.

55
00:03:05,520 --> 00:03:08,460
So this angle is equal to Anglesey over here.

56
00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:10,350
Now we know this length.

57
00:03:10,560 --> 00:03:13,750
So let me measure out this length and find a point over here.

58
00:03:14,100 --> 00:03:15,320
Let me take that point.

59
00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:19,500
This point are right now, we have used up two pieces of information.

60
00:03:19,690 --> 00:03:23,840
The third piece of information that we have is we know the length of a B.

61
00:03:24,180 --> 00:03:24,620
All right.

62
00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:29,100
Now, I have this line segment going on like this now with my compass.

63
00:03:29,220 --> 00:03:33,450
Let me put the sharp edge at point out and let me draw an arc.

64
00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:38,430
You will see that in many cases it will intersect this line in two points.

65
00:03:39,210 --> 00:03:45,330
So you can construct B are like this, which is case one, which is this case over here.

66
00:03:45,540 --> 00:03:47,730
Or you can construct we are like this.

67
00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:50,420
Right, which is this case over here.

68
00:03:50,670 --> 00:03:58,560
So you are not able to construct an exact copy of Triangle ABC when you just have two sides and an angle,

69
00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:04,680
which is not the included angle given there is ambiguity without ambiguity, you're not able to construct

70
00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:06,120
a copy of Triangle ABC.

71
00:04:06,270 --> 00:04:12,840
Hence SC is not a sufficient condition to establish congruency of two triangles.

72
00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:13,190
Right?

73
00:04:13,410 --> 00:04:15,000
Again, you can see why that is.

74
00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:20,970
So say you have this triangle over here and you have this triangle over here, which we can see that

75
00:04:20,970 --> 00:04:25,740
if you superimpose one on top of the other, it will not cover it exactly right.

76
00:04:25,860 --> 00:04:30,840
And hence SSA is not a sufficient condition to establish congruency.
