All right.
So let's look at this.
Yes don't give an answering strategy.
Let's take a shot at it and see how to do it.
We'll explain to you how do you know when something is true.
How do you know something is false.
How do you recognize when something is not given.
So what we've done here is we have a test on that given question that I have poor from the passage the
matching sentence for the question and we're doing there so you can see that what you're doing with
this on a given question is you're comparing two sentences.
Now on the exam this is not what they're doing on the exam.
They're not going to tell you the sentence that the question is coming from.
You have to scan and find the sentence and then compare the here putting the two things together so
you can see the question and also see the sentence that was coming from the passage heaven and see that
you have to compare those two things together.
OK.
All right so that's why we're doing it this way.
All right.
Now if you want to try to do the questions along with me what you need to do is you need to.
When I tell what I say so you need to start stop the lecture and you can try to answer it and then afterwards
you can listen to my answer and my explanation.
So that's what that's what we can do.
If you want to be able to if you want to be able to go along with me.
OK.
So here is question number one.
So question one says Michael Flaherty was the first person to recognize Perkins ability as a student
of chemistry.
All right.
So that is the question.
And then the matching sentence from the passage you would find this by scanning the passage the matching
sentences Perkins talent and devotion to the study of the elements was first noticed by his teacher
Tom Watson.
All right so here we have the right.
Here we have the question.
Right that's our question.
OK.
And then right here this right here is the.
Sorry about that.
This right here is the sentence that is from the passage itself I pulled it for you pulled it from the
passage and put it together so when we look at this like up don't you.
What we're looking at is we are comparing.
We're comparing the question and we're comparing it to this sentence that's coming from the passage.
You have to look at it and say well are the is the subject the same.
Why is the subject The same is the are the nouns basically are the nouns the same are the verbs the
same.
Here is the limiting language the same the adjectives and adverbs and so forth and so on.
So I look at these two sentences here.
All right.
So the question says Michael Fioretti was the first person to recognize Perkins ability as a student
of chemistry.
So sometimes when you look at a question you can almost tell what they're going to be focusing on.
Right.
The real focus here is dealing with what he the first person to recognize this ability.
So we look at the question down here at the past it's to pass that sentence.
Says Perkins talent and devotion to the study of the elements was first noticed by his teacher Tom Watson.
All right so here we have two different subjects.
As the person who first noticed in the question it says Michael feared he was the first person in the
passage.
It says he was first noticed by his teacher Tom Watson.
So this answer would be well here.
You want to stop the tape now.
You want to answer for yourself stop the tape.
OK.
So this answer would be false.
Right.
It would be false because like I told you an answer is false.
When the when one of the subject or object or you know the nouns are or verbs are changed or different
or opposite he ever say here they have been changed.
The question says Michael feared the person was the first person to pass his sentences that Tom Watson
was the first person.
So that's an example of false because they were change the name for changed.
Question number two question says Michael Ferdy's suggested that Perkins enroll at the Royal College
of chemistry.
Here is the matching passage sentence he would find this of course by scanning the passage and looking
for it.
So Michael veritie suggested that Perkins a role at the Royal College of chemistry the surgeons from
the passage it says the young chemist Perkins became very excited after hearing speeches and decided
to attend the Royal College of chemistry.
All right so we have to look more when we're doing a comparison of the two sentences.
When you do when you're comparing the question and you're comparing this it in the passage you're looking
at the question looking at the question and saying is all the information here true.
Are the nouns and verbs and adjectives and adverbs.
True is something changed in the question that will be false is something missing is something missing
from the question.
There's something missing from the question that will make it be not given.
Now our question says Michael Fioretti suggested that Perkins a role at the Royal College of chemistry.
So again we can look at the question and really tell what they're focusing on.
Did Michael Verity suggest this.
Is that what he suggested our passage and say as the young chemist Perkins became very excited after
hearing speeches and decided to attend the Royal College of chemistry.
All right.
So stop the tape if you want to try to answer it for yourself.
OK.
So the answer here would be not given not given.
Why is it not given.
Because when we look at the sentence from the passage we don't know if Michael Farrelly suggested that
he go or not we don't know if somebody else suggested that we go we don't know it's not given it doesn't
tell us anything.
OK.
It doesn't tell us anything.
It doesn't tell us if somebody suggested that he go or not we don't know.
All right.
It's missing.
This information is missing.
If it were false it would say somebody else suggested that he go OK that's what they would say if it
were false it was somebody else suggested that he go Pryke if it were true it would say Michael Ferretti
suggested that he go.
But we don't know.
Right.
We don't know.
Well you don't know the answer is not given.
If you come if it is maybe the answer is not given.
True is always true false is always false.
Number three Perkins was still young when he made the discovery that made him rich and famous.
Now matching that passage sentence.
Not long after he became the youngest assistant.
He made the finding they would bring him fame and fortune.
All right stop the tape if you want to try to do it yourself and come up with the answer.
Again Perkins was still young when he made the discovery that made him rich and famous.
All right.
So was a young when he made the discovery the made him rich and famous I saw questions and says there
aren't that long after he became the youngest assistant.
So we see that he was young.
He made a finding finding a synonym for discovery that would bring him fame and fortune fame and fortune
as a synonym for rich and famous.
So here we have a situation where the answer is true.
The answer is true.
OK.
And we're using set a new language here finding for discovery bring him fame and fortune the synonym
for making him rich and famous.
So this is an example of a choice that is true.
You will put true or yes as your answer for this one.
Number four the trees from which quinine is derived only grows in South America.
The trees from which quinine is derived only grows in South America.
All right the matching passes sentence the drug quinine is taken from the bark of the Chong cola tree
which is found in South America.
You're right.
You should stop the tape if you want to answer it yourself.
All right.
So the trees from from which quinine is derived only grows in South America.
All right.
The drug quinine is taken from the bark of the chicle a tree which is found in South America.
Now we have to ask ourself do we have the tree here.
Yes we have the tree.
They have a mention of a tree.
All right.
Do we have quinine.
Yeah we have that.
We have South America.
Yes.
All right.
Now derived is synonym for failed.
However we're missing something we're missing something in the past sentence.
It doesn't say that it only grows in South America.
Yes it is found in South America.
So this the word only is an example of extreme language when you have extreme language missing from
the passage when you have extreme language missing from the passage.
If it's not there or there's no synonym of the extreme language your answer is not given.
We don't know when we look at the passage sentence when we look at the passage sentence we don't know
if it is only found in South America as is found in South America.
You look at the passage maybe it is only in South America maybe it is we don't know.
Right.
The passage sentence doesn't say it.
It's missing.
All right.
Again that's an example of not giving.
OK are you getting it.
Number five Parker is what inspired by the famous discoveries of the scientist Louis Pasture.
Because of those past chores words Perkins really decided what he wanted to be in life why do we have
Perkins yet we have that.
What you had to focus on here is was he inspired by the discoveries of Lewis past.
Sure.
All right.
Our passing sentence sentences because of Lewis pastor's words Perkins decided what he wanted to be
alive when he says he what he decided when he went to be in life.
That's like saying he was inspired.
Question says he was inspired by the famous discoveries are our past sense because of his words.
So here is an example of that.
False.
False because it's been changed.
We have something different changed or different means false.
The questions say has been inspired by discoveries.
Here it says because of Lewis past George the words words are different than discoveries.
All right so one sentence says he was inspired by the discoveries but the passage says he was he did
it was because of the man's words.
And here we have an example of false false false false.
Are you getting it false.
Question 6.
Marie Curie's husband was the joint winner of both of Marie's Nobel Prizes.
All right we have our matching passive sentence with her husband Pierre Curie and Henry Johnson.
She won our first Nobel Prize in 1933 and then Marie was the sole winner of her 1935 Nobel Prize.
So our question again is Marie Curie's husband was the joint winner of both Marie's Nobel Prizes.
So what they probably are going to be focusing on here when we look at the question is was the joint
winner of both right.
Like I said for most questions you can really look and see what are they really going to focus on probably
in deciding true false or not given.
Right you can almost always look at the question and be able to tell what are they going to focus on
to determine truth was not given.
Right.
So joint winner of both right when we look at the passage it says that we're curious.
Henry Johnson with those two she won our first Nobel Prize.
And there she was the sole winner of the 1935 prize.
So number six is an example of false because number six the questions they asked her husband was a joint
winner of both.
But when we look at the past sentence it says her husband won the first one with her but the second
one was shoot the second one she won by herself.
Second one she won by herself.
So he was not the joint winner of both the information is different.
OK.
The information is different.
So this is an example of false for a lot of students they really struggle with the difference between
not giving and false right false means the information has been changed.
We have a different cause.
We have a different source.
OK.
One is not given to me that it's missing.
All right.
All the information is missing.
That's a there's a difference there's a difference there's a difference there's a difference.
All right.
So let's stop here then what we're going to do another video again and do some more or more practice
like this.
OK.
Talk to you soon.