1 00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:08,500 Not just look at your statement which is similar to a vague statement a continual statement is used 2 00:00:08,500 --> 00:00:11,380 with only loops that is either with furler. 3 00:00:11,410 --> 00:00:11,990 Why not. 4 00:00:12,010 --> 00:00:14,670 Or do I look so unlike break. 5 00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:16,520 It's not used with a switch statement. 6 00:00:18,270 --> 00:00:24,700 And as the names are just a continual statement continues with the next iteration of the innermost loop 7 00:00:25,660 --> 00:00:32,290 on any statements immediately following it are not executor so well a big statement is used to break 8 00:00:32,290 --> 00:00:40,060 out of the innermost loop a continual statement is used to continue with the innermost true here's an 9 00:00:40,060 --> 00:00:46,060 example the continue statement is used in a while statement typically as shown here continue would be 10 00:00:46,060 --> 00:00:50,760 engrossed in an IF statement so then continue stateman gets executed. 11 00:00:51,040 --> 00:00:56,340 The rest of the why loop escape and we continue with the next iteration with the condition expression 12 00:00:56,340 --> 00:00:57,400 is evaluated. 13 00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:04,650 Not this book it can be a statement in a fuddle hit as soon as the continue statement is encountered 14 00:01:04,850 --> 00:01:06,620 the rest of the for loop is good. 15 00:01:06,860 --> 00:01:12,860 And then any expressions in the expression this study evaluated only after that the condition expression 16 00:01:12,860 --> 00:01:14,520 is evaluated. 17 00:01:14,660 --> 00:01:20,390 We know that this is how a for loop cycle normally books on it is no different when a continuous treatment 18 00:01:20,390 --> 00:01:21,300 is involved. 19 00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:27,960 Here's an invalid example which is similar to the one we saw when discussing break. 20 00:01:28,290 --> 00:01:31,260 It gives a compiler as there is no and closing look. 21 00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:38,150 Like in the case of a break statement there is actually a label can be in your statement which is very 22 00:01:38,150 --> 00:01:46,120 useful when dealing with nested loops husbandly to label the loop which we want to continue read for 23 00:01:46,150 --> 00:01:51,710 this we have the label name followed by a colon which is in turn followed by a loop statement like a 24 00:01:51,730 --> 00:01:58,310 for a while next somewhere within that loop we can have a label can in your statement. 25 00:01:58,620 --> 00:02:04,340 Well the key word continue is followed by the label name know I want to highlight a difference between 26 00:02:04,430 --> 00:02:08,250 label break a label continue here we continue. 27 00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:15,260 The label is associated with only an end closing loop statement like a fire Otterbein hover over the 28 00:02:15,260 --> 00:02:16,230 break statement. 29 00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:23,270 The label can be associated with any block statement number block statement can also be an if statement 30 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:28,360 so it means that labels continue cannot be used with an if statement. 31 00:02:29,940 --> 00:02:36,810 Here it is called on the left use label break and the label is associated with an if statement and it 32 00:02:36,810 --> 00:02:38,200 is perfectly valid. 33 00:02:38,750 --> 00:02:44,820 Whereas on the right is an example of often label continue and we get a compiler error at the continue 34 00:02:44,820 --> 00:02:53,060 statement as the label it uses is associated with an if statement rather than an enclosing local not 35 00:02:53,100 --> 00:02:55,400 lost your shot them off label continue. 36 00:02:55,550 --> 00:03:01,320 The code is very similar to the Corbie software and they will bring a new medical label continue has 37 00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:04,000 been added but the basics democracy. 38 00:03:04,190 --> 00:03:04,990 Let's look at the code. 39 00:03:04,990 --> 00:03:09,840 Now OK here is the new method label continue. 40 00:03:10,140 --> 00:03:16,470 And as you can see it is very identical to the label brick method which we have seen in the break statement 41 00:03:16,620 --> 00:03:17,100 . 42 00:03:17,430 --> 00:03:23,670 OK so we have the same number variable initialized to zero and we have the nested for loop and we have 43 00:03:23,670 --> 00:03:29,820 the same if condition our number is getting incremented here and we are printing it here pending the 44 00:03:29,820 --> 00:03:31,180 final value of. 45 00:03:31,770 --> 00:03:33,960 And we have the same label outermost. 46 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:39,330 And the only difference the only difference here is that we how this statement continues. 47 00:03:39,330 --> 00:03:44,010 So the break statement the label break has been replaced with a label continue. 48 00:03:44,010 --> 00:03:47,490 That's the only difference even the condition is also seen. 49 00:03:47,790 --> 00:03:52,650 OK so here we are initialising number zero and up within the nested for loop. 50 00:03:52,740 --> 00:03:56,860 Each nested For each for loop is iterating 14 times. 51 00:03:57,270 --> 00:04:04,470 And here the condition is if I equals five and Jake was five in that case we are going to continue with 52 00:04:04,470 --> 00:04:05,730 the outermost loop. 53 00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:06,490 OK. 54 00:04:06,510 --> 00:04:10,980 So normally this would in a for loop What did it for 100 times. 55 00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:19,140 But when I is equal to 5 then we are in J's equal to 5 then we are skipping the last five iterations 56 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:25,760 of the innermost loop and we are just continuing with the next iteration of the outer outer most for 57 00:04:25,770 --> 00:04:26,130 low. 58 00:04:26,190 --> 00:04:26,660 OK. 59 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:30,440 So we are just keeping the five five iterations here. 60 00:04:30,450 --> 00:04:37,710 One is equal to five and J is equal to five which means that we are skipping Jake will do 5 6 7 8 and 61 00:04:37,710 --> 00:04:38,380 9. 62 00:04:38,380 --> 00:04:38,710 OK. 63 00:04:38,730 --> 00:04:45,620 Five of them sort of hundred hundred iterations we are skipping five and so numb would be incremental 64 00:04:45,630 --> 00:04:46,310 to 95. 65 00:04:46,310 --> 00:04:50,600 So they know for loop isn't rim is it rating for 95 times. 66 00:04:50,610 --> 00:04:53,510 OK so let's just go ahead and run it. 67 00:04:53,520 --> 00:05:00,930 It's already compiled as you can see it is printing 95 so that's about labeled on Daneel statement. 68 00:05:00,990 --> 00:05:01,670 OK. 69 00:05:01,830 --> 00:05:05,580 Know you can also find this program in the resource section. 70 00:05:05,580 --> 00:05:06,220 OK. 71 00:05:06,540 --> 00:05:07,100 Thank you. 72 00:05:07,100 --> 00:05:07,990 And happy coding.